There is very little research on the impact of second language learning for students with learning disabilities (LD).
It could certainly stand to reason that students who struggle to learn English (their native language) would also struggle to learn a second, symbol-based language such as Hebrew.
And yet, this is not
always the case. While some find it extremely difficult to differentiate the
shapes and sounds of the letters and the patterns of the vowels, there are
those students with learning disabilities that excel in Hebrew, particularly
because it is symbol-based.
Generalization about Hebrew
language acquisition for students with learning disabilities can be tricky. The
way in which any particular child’s abilities will impact second-language
learning varies tremendously as there are many different forms of LD. As an
advocate for inclusion, I am uniquely attuned to the fact that each of
us has a unique learning style and that all children can experience a
variety of challenges in any educational setting.
What I find most salient
to the work of Jewish Educators in supplemental religious schools is that the
demands of language learning can actually lead to cases where previously
undiagnosed learning disabilities are uncovered in the second-language
classroom.
Why?
Why?
Some children have developed coping mechanisms that effectively
mask problems in their native language, but the second language acts as a
magnifying glass to expose more subtle difficulties. Basically, we can see
children who have been able to “fake it” when working in their native language have
trouble hiding these problems when working in a second language. So what does
this mean for our once or twice-a-week Hebrew classes?
How do religious
school educators handle being the front line when a child struggles?
Establishing open
lines of communication with parents is critical. An ability to share what is
happening in the classroom and to welcome the advice and support of parents is
essential in all educational settings. Such healthy relationships will enable you to
speak to parents openly and honestly. You do not have to be trained in any
special methodology to share your concerns in a kind, supportive manner.
How can teachers, who
do not typically have backgrounds in special education and may not even have backgrounds
in education, manage such responsibility?
It is significant to
recognize that we, as Jewish Educators and religious school teachers, are not
qualified to diagnose or classify students (unless, of course, you happen to
have such credentials). This does not mean that we can't share what we see or
experience with our students. (I strongly suggest documenting patterns of
behavior.) Quite the opposite. We MUST share what students are experiencing in
our classrooms; we just need to choose our words carefully, especially when learning
issues are emerging in our classrooms and have yet to be identified in other
educational settings.
Don’t we need an
expert?
It would be ideal to have
someone on your faculty with a background, degree or certification in special
education, but this is not always feasible. An alternative is to hire a consultant who can periodically observe students and/or meet with faculty to
conduct training sessions and provide support. Maybe you even have someone within your
congregation with such a background who would be willing to volunteer their services
in support of the school.
Children with learning
disabilities can absolutely learn Hebrew when the instruction is varied and
individualized to their unique needs. Indeed, all students will benefit from such an
approach.
Subscribe to Removing the Stumbling Block so you never miss a post:
No comments:
Post a Comment